AI Readiness report
Example Homewares
example-homewares.com
The biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Your Product schema only appears after JavaScript runs, so ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity can't see it. Fixing server-side schema is the single highest-leverage change here.
The dimension driving that:
Whether the site publishes an llms.txt file — an emerging convention for pointing AI agents to your key pages. Low weight while adoption is early.
The full picture, dimension by dimension:
Structured data & crawlability
-
AI crawler visibility 10
Whether your product's structured data is in the page's initial HTML or only appears after JavaScript runs. ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity read the initial HTML — anything that needs JavaScript is invisible to them.
-
Structured data validity 35
Whether your structured data is valid: it parses cleanly, required fields are present, values are the right type, and nothing contradicts the visible page.
-
Structured data completeness 20
How complete your structured data is beyond the basics — product ID (GTIN), manufacturer part number (MPN), ratings, price validity, and return and shipping policy.
-
Site-wide structured data 15
Structured data across the rest of the site, not just the product page — your organization details, site search, breadcrumbs, and FAQ markup.
-
Content visible after load 48
How much real product text remains once JavaScript has run. Copy hidden inside tabs or accordions can be invisible to AI agents.
-
Page and data agree 40
Whether the page a shopper sees and your structured data agree on price, availability, brand, and title. Mismatches read as a trust problem to an agent.
-
Image readiness 45
How usable your product images are to AI: enough images, descriptive alt text, image structured data, and responsive sizes. Agents increasingly read images, not just text.
-
Freshness 50 Informational
Signals about how recently the page was updated. Informational for now (not scored) until a reliable signal lands.
-
Internal linking 30
Whether the product page links out to its category, related products, and brand pages — the trail an agent follows to understand your catalog.
-
llms.txt file 0
Whether the site publishes an llms.txt file — an emerging convention for pointing AI agents to your key pages. Low weight while adoption is early.
-
agents.md file Not detected Informational
Whether the site publishes an /agents.md file — an emerging convention, alongside llms.txt, for pointing AI agents to a site's real agent endpoint. Informational for now while the standard is nascent.
-
MCP endpoint Detected Informational
Whether the storefront exposes a reachable Model Context Protocol (MCP) endpoint — the emerging way for AI agents to query a catalog and act on it directly. Informational for now while the standard is nascent.
Content quality (AI-graded)
-
Title quality 52
Whether product titles are structured and descriptive — brand, product type, a key attribute, and the variant — rather than a bare product name.
-
Description depth 38
Whether descriptions are rich with real attributes and answer the questions a shopper actually asks, rather than marketing fluff.
-
Q&A and use-case content 12
Whether the page has the question-and-answer pairs, usage scenarios, and compatibility notes an AI agent can quote back to a shopper.
-
Product identifiers 25
Whether the core product identifiers — GTIN, MPN, brand, and model number — are present and actually valid.
-
Availability detail 30
Whether availability is specific — exact stock, handling time, and restock dates — rather than a bare in-stock / out-of-stock flag.
And against the cohort —
Where this product stands
Lumio benchmarks this score against a live research set — real product pages from the top brands in each category and platform, all scored on the same 16 signals. Your standing is exactly where this product lands in that field. It's the same field ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude pull from, so the ranking is the one that actually matters.At 30 out of 100, 82% of premium homewares on BigCommerce score higher. The typical product there scores around 61 — real ground to make up.
Cohort widened to clear the minimum sample — platform filter dropped.
Link copied